• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
  • Events
  • Contact

PRRAC — Connecting Research to Advocacy

Poverty & Race Research Action Council

MENUMENU
  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – by Program
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility (Section 8)
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
  • School Diversity
  • Environmental Justice
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Housing-School Nexus
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • One Nation Indivisible: School Diversity, Immigrant Integration, and Multi-Racial Coalitions
    • PRRAC in the Courts
    • CarsonWatch
    • Alliance Housing Justice
  • Search
    • Search

You are here: Home / Browse PRRAC Content / PRRAC Op-Eds and Blogs / Good News and Serious Challenges in Brookings Report on Suburban Poverty (Huffington Post)

Good News and Serious Challenges in Brookings Report on Suburban Poverty (Huffington Post)

May 21, 2013 by

By Philip Tegeler, PRRAC

The powerful new book from Brookings, Confronting Suburban Poverty in America, shows how family poverty has spread beyond its traditional geographic boundaries, and how our institutions and policies need to adapt to this new reality.

As the report points out, more poor people now live in suburbs than in central cities. There is both “good news” and “bad news” in this trend.

One piece of good news is that more poor families are living outside of the most concentrated poverty neighborhoods, in areas with better schools and lower crime rates.

The bad news is that we are still allowing some higher opportunity suburban towns to exclude low-income families, which will inexorably lead to re-concentration and re-segregation in older suburban towns. A small but increasing number of suburban communities have poverty rates exceeding 20 percent.

These numbers reinforce the importance of regional housing strategies to open up new opportunities for low-income families and avoid re-segregation. Each suburban community needs to do its fair share — especially our most wealthy communities.

As the report makes clear, we also need to develop better regional systems for delivering services to low-income families, services that are not tied to specific city neighborhoods.

In spite of the Brookings report’s “headline” about increasing suburban poverty, we also need to remember that concentrated poverty in our cities is persisting, and even expanding. The families living in these city neighborhoods continue to need help to move out of poverty.

There are other policy implications:

• The Brookings report highlights the role of the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program in increased suburban poverty. But instead of offering families a real choice — including high-opportunity communities with excellent schools, the HCV program has tended to concentrate poor families in lower opportunity, distressed suburban communities (in addition to lower opportunity city neighborhoods). The authors of the report repeat the longstanding recommendation that HUD should work to consolidate fragmented local Section 8 administrators into regional housing agencies. This kind of regional consolidation, coupled with an active mobility strategy and improved voucher rent structures, will also help to stabilize more distressed suburban communities.

• The Poverty & Race Research Action Council (PRRAC) applauds the report’s emphasis on creating a more regional approach in some of our other key housing programs — the Low Income Housing Tax Credit, the HOME program, and the Community Development Block Grant program. HUD’s current “Sustainable Communities Initiative” is trying to do this on a small scale now, but the Brookings report recommends taking this a step further and creating a new competitive grant program they call the “Metropolitan Opportunity Challenge” using 5 percent of existing federal funds to create incentives for state and local governments and nonprofits to collaborate and take on regional poverty challenges in creative new ways.

• While the Brookings idea for a “Metro Opportunity Challenge” fund is promising, we need to recognize that it only affects — at its most ambitious — 5 percent of federal “place-based antipoverty funding.’’ We also need to pay attention to the remaining 95 percent of place-based funding, which in the past have tended to drive segregation and poverty concentration.

One area where the Brookings report falls somewhat short is in its failure to recommend responses that directly address race and racial segregation. Although the report notes that white families still make up the majority of the suburban poor, an increasing number of low-income families of color are moving into suburban areas.

In 2008, the National Commission on Fair Housing highlighted diverse older suburbs as presenting an important opportunity for stable long term racial integration — but the dynamics of “white flight” and “tipping” are still with us, and will continue to be with us as long as we have racial discrimination and steering in real estate markets and exclusionary zoning keeping lower cost housing out of some communities. Strong fair housing enforcement needs to be included in any strategy going forward — and HUD needs to issue a strong “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing” rule that will set clear expectations for suburban communities with growing poor populations.

The Department of Education also has an important role to play in insisting that diverse suburbs maintain internal school integration, and work collectively with other school districts in the region to avoid re-segregation.

One possible silver lining in the report is the way that poverty is becoming much more visible in more of our communities. It is becoming harder for middle-class families and voters to “look the other way,” with poverty safely confined to far away city neighborhoods. This new visibility could have the effect of finally moving a national conversation about reducing poverty. It will also make it more difficult for more privileged Americans to demonize and stereotype the distant poor.

As the Brookings report emphasizes, we are at a crucial moment of opportunity now in the evolving story of suburban poverty, and we need to move quickly to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past. We need to plan intentionally to shape more equitable regions and ensure that low-income families have a secure home in all of our communities – and long term hope for moving out of poverty.

Philip Tegeler is executive director of the Poverty & Race Research Action Council, a civil rights policy organization based in Washington, D.C.

Filed Under: Philip Tegeler, PRRAC in the News, PRRAC Op-Eds and Blogs

Primary Sidebar

PRRAC Updates

PRRAC Update (January 14, 2021): Cashin on “Whitelash”; More HUD and ED Developments

PRRAC Update (December 22, 2020): 30th Anniversary Issue; and Another Victory for School Integration

PRRAC Update (December 10, 2020): Recommendations for a new AFFH rule + school integration goals for the first 100 days

Previous Updates...

PRRAC in the News

Billions in School Construction in CT Hasn’t Made a Dent in Segregation — But This Year, Things Could Be Different (Connecticut Mirror)

January 4, 2021

Education Dept. Gets $73.5 Billion in Funding Deal That Ends Ban on Federal Aid for Busing (Education Week)

December 22, 2020

Massachusetts’ Public Schools are Highly Segregated. It’s Time We Treated That Like the Crisis It Is (Boston Globe)

December 11, 2020

Opinion: A Truly Life-Changing Voucher Program is Within Reach for Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority (Cleveland.com)

October 12, 2020

Previous Posts...

PRRAC on Twitter

Tweets by @PRRAC_DC

Poverty & Race Journal

Footer

PRRAC – Poverty & Race Research Action Council

The Poverty & Race Research Action Council (PRRAC) is a civil rights law and policy organization based in Washington, D.C. Our mission is to promote research-based advocacy strategies to address structural inequality and disrupt the systems that disadvantage low-income people of color. PRRAC was founded in 1989, through an initiative of major civil rights, civil liberties, and anti-poverty groups seeking to connect advocates with social scientists working at the intersection of race and poverty…Read More

Archives

Resources at PRRAC

  • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fair Housing
  • Fair Housing & Community Development
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • PRRAC Update
  • School Diversity
  • Housing Choice Voucher Mobility
  • PRRAC in The Courts

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in var _ctct_m = "7608c7e98e90af7d6ba8b5fd4d901424"; //static.ctctcdn.com/js/signup-form-widget/current/signup-form-widget.min.js

PRRAC — Connecting Research to Advocacy

  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – by Program
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility (Section 8)
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
  • School Diversity
  • Environmental Justice
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Housing-School Nexus
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • One Nation Indivisible: School Diversity, Immigrant Integration, and Multi-Racial Coalitions
    • PRRAC in the Courts
    • CarsonWatch
    • Alliance Housing Justice
  • Search
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
  • Events
  • Contact