• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
  • Events
  • Contact

PRRAC — Connecting Research to Advocacy

Poverty & Race Research Action Council

MENUMENU
  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – by Program
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility (Section 8)
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
  • School Diversity
  • Environmental Justice
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Housing-School Nexus
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • One Nation Indivisible: School Diversity, Immigrant Integration, and Multi-Racial Coalitions
    • PRRAC in the Courts
    • Alliance Housing Justice
  • Search
    • Search

You are here: Home / Browse PRRAC Content / Advocacy Guides / Public or Community Control of Rental Housing Policy Brief No. 2: Using Eminent Domain to Acquire Private Rental Housing – Recent Examples (PRRAC, October 2020)

Public or Community Control of Rental Housing Policy Brief No. 2: Using Eminent Domain to Acquire Private Rental Housing – Recent Examples (PRRAC, October 2020)

October 23, 2020 by

The King County Housing Authority (KCHA) in Washington State has used eminent domain as part of its affordable housing strategy. Under Washington State law, public housing authorities are authorized to use eminent domain to acquire housing projects within their area of operation.[1] KCHA has used the threat of eminent domain to encourage owners to sell affordable multifamily rental properties to the housing authority.[2] In 2019, the agency followed through on the threat to acquire property through eminent domain. KCHA’s Board of Commissioners passed resolutions approving the use of eminent domain to acquire multifamily properties if the housing authority was unsuccessful in negotiating their purchase.[3] The multifamily properties targeted for acquisition were considered to be at high risk of losing affordability, which would result in displacement of residents.[4] In September of 2019, KCHA used eminent domain to acquire 5 properties for $245 million.[5] These included two Fannie Mae backed multifamily properties.[6]

Gil Cedillo, a member of the Los Angeles City Council, has proposed the use of eminent domain to protect tenants at a complex where affordability restrictions will expire and rents will be raised to market-rate levels. On March 27, the City Council voted to instruct the City Attorney and the Los Angeles Housing and Community Investment Department to issue a report within 30 days on the use of eminent domain.[7]

Eminent domain can also be used to acquire intangible property.[8] The novel idea of using eminent domain to address foreclosures emerged in the early 2010s as a way to address the foreclosure crisis.[9] Several communities around the country such as Richmond, California seriously explored the feasibility of using eminent domain to seize underwater mortgages, restructure loans to reduce the principal, and then resell the debt to a private buyer.[10] While the idea generated much debate and scholarly discussion[11], it also created strong backlash from those who owned the mortgages and challenged its constitutionality under the Takings Clause.[12] Congress ultimately passed legislation making it illegal for the federal government to back mortgages seized through eminent domain, effectively ending any possibility of implementation.[13]

(updated April 13, 2020)

[1] Wash. Rev. Code §35.82.070 https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=35.82.070

[2] Jared Brey, Activists Urge Los Angeles to Use Eminent Domain to Save City’s Affordable Housing, Next City (Feb. 11, 2020), available at https://nextcity.org/daily/entry/activists-urge-los-angeles-use-eminent-domain-save-affordable-housing

[3] The Housing Authority of the County of King, Resolution No. 5625, A Resolution Authorizing Acquisition of Emerson Apartments (June 4, 2019), https://www.kcha.org/Portals/0/PDF/Board/201906%20KCHA%20Board%20Packet.pdfl; The Housing Authority of the County of King, Resolution No. 5622, A Resolution Authorizing Acquisition of Kendall Ridge Apartments (Mar. 25, 2019), https://www.kcha.org/Portals/0/PDF/Board/201905%20KCHA%20BOARD%20PACKET%20A.pdf

[4] Id.

[5] Housing Action Affects Agency Bonds, (Jan. 17, 2020), https://www.cmalert.com/search.pl?ARTICLE=187772

[6] Fannie Mae, Multifamily Properties Purchased Through Eminent Domain, https://www.fanniemae.com/portal/funding-the-market/mbs/news/2019/multifamily-properties-eminent-domain-100919.html

[7]https://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect/index.cfm?fa=ccfi.viewrecord&cfnumber=20-0148

[8] Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford, 295 U.S. 555, 596 (1935)

[9] See Robert Hockett, “We Don’t Follow, We Lead”: How New York City Will Save Mortgage Loans by Condemning Them, The Yale Law Journal Forum (Nov. 29, 2014), available at https://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/HockettPDF_moakg6ig.pdf

[10] Sarah Thompson, Eminent Domain for the Seizure of Underwater Mortgages, 47 U. Mich. J. L. Reform 22-23 (2013), available at https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=mjlr_caveat

[11] See Ngai Pindell, Nevada’s Residential Real Estate Crisis: Local Governments and the Use of Eminent Domain to Condemn Mortgage Notes, 13 Nev. L. Rev. 888 (2013), available at https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1487&context=nlj

[12] Robert Rogers, Banks Sue Richmond to Halt Plan to Seize Mortgages, San Jose Mercury News, Aug. 8, 2013, https://www.mercurynews.com/2013/08/08/banks-sue-richmond-to-halt-plan-to-seize-mortgages/

[13] https://www.consumerfinancialserviceswatch.com/2014/12/eminent-enabler-congress-prohibits-hud-and-ginnie-mae-from-facilitating-local-government-seizure-of-mortgage-loans/

Filed Under: Advocacy Guides, Fair Housing & Community Development

You might also like…

Public or Community Control of Rental Housing Policy Brief No. 3: Community Land Trusts and Other Public Ownership Vehicles (PRRAC, October 2020)
Public or Community Control of Rental Housing Policy Brief No. 1: Right of First Refusal – Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Acts (PRRAC, October 2020)

Primary Sidebar

PRRAC Updates

PRRAC Update (February 19, 2021): 28 applications for the housing mobility demonstration!

PRRAC Update (January 28, 2021): Good luck to HUD Secretary-Nominee Marcia Fudge in Today’s Hearing!

PRRAC Update (January 14, 2021): Cashin on “Whitelash”; More HUD and ED Developments

Previous Updates...

PRRAC in the News

America’s Racist Housing Rules Really Can Be Fixed (Vox)

February 17, 2021

Billions in School Construction in CT Hasn’t Made a Dent in Segregation — But This Year, Things Could Be Different (Connecticut Mirror)

January 4, 2021

Education Dept. Gets $73.5 Billion in Funding Deal That Ends Ban on Federal Aid for Busing (Education Week)

December 22, 2020

Massachusetts’ Public Schools are Highly Segregated. It’s Time We Treated That Like the Crisis It Is (Boston Globe)

December 11, 2020

Previous Posts...

PRRAC on Twitter

Tweets by @PRRAC_DC

Poverty & Race Journal

Footer

PRRAC – Poverty & Race Research Action Council

The Poverty & Race Research Action Council (PRRAC) is a civil rights law and policy organization based in Washington, D.C. Our mission is to promote research-based advocacy strategies to address structural inequality and disrupt the systems that disadvantage low-income people of color. PRRAC was founded in 1989, through an initiative of major civil rights, civil liberties, and anti-poverty groups seeking to connect advocates with social scientists working at the intersection of race and poverty…Read More

Archives

Resources at PRRAC

  • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fair Housing
  • Fair Housing & Community Development
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • PRRAC Update
  • School Diversity
  • Housing Choice Voucher Mobility
  • PRRAC in The Courts

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in var _ctct_m = "7608c7e98e90af7d6ba8b5fd4d901424"; //static.ctctcdn.com/js/signup-form-widget/current/signup-form-widget.min.js

PRRAC — Connecting Research to Advocacy

  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – by Program
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility (Section 8)
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
  • School Diversity
  • Environmental Justice
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Housing-School Nexus
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • One Nation Indivisible: School Diversity, Immigrant Integration, and Multi-Racial Coalitions
    • PRRAC in the Courts
    • Alliance Housing Justice
  • Search
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
  • Events
  • Contact