• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
  • Events
  • Contact

PRRAC — Connecting Research to Advocacy

Poverty & Race Research Action Council

MENUMENU
  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – by Program
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility (Section 8)
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
  • School Diversity
  • Environmental Justice
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Housing-School Nexus
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • One Nation Indivisible: School Diversity, Immigrant Integration, and Multi-Racial Coalitions
    • PRRAC in the Courts
    • CarsonWatch
    • Alliance Housing Justice
  • Search
    • Search

You are here: Home / Browse PRRAC Content / PRRAC Update / PRRAC Update (November 3, 2016): Latest developments in ICP’s civil rights suit against the Treasury Department

PRRAC Update (November 3, 2016): Latest developments in ICP’s civil rights suit against the Treasury Department

November 3, 2016 by

Inclusive Communities Project v. Department of Treasury and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency :  U.S. District Judge Sidney Fitzwater has once again upheld the Inclusive Communities Project’s 2014 challenge to the Treasury Department’s failure to comply with the Fair Housing Act in its administration of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit.  In a 38-page decision, Judge Fitzwater dismissed ICP’s “disparate impact” claims under the Fair Housing Act, but rejected the federal government’s motion to dismiss ICP’s claims under the “Affirmatively Furthering” provision of the Fair Housing Act (42 USC § 3608 via the Administrative Procedure Act).  Judge Fitzwater also rejected the government’s motion to dismiss ICP’s intentional discrimination claims under the Constitution and the Fair Housing Act, specifically reviewing the Treasury Department’s deliberate history of inaction and using the intentional discrimination analysis set out by the U.S. Supreme Court in Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation(1978).

In our view, the “disparate impact” portion of the Court’s decision applies an overly restrictive view of the “causation” standard set out by the Supreme Court in ICP v Texas last summer.  This is similar to the analysis Judge Fitzwater used last month to dismiss ICP’s disparate impact claims against the state of Texas (on remand from the Supreme Court).  The good news is that other federal courts are not necessarily taking this same restrictive approach to disparate impact analysis, and as illustrated by this week’s decision, ICP’s claims to reform the LIHTC program do not depend on this “disparate impact” provision of the Fair Housing Act alone.

State AFFH compliance : We continued to provide HUD with feedback on its implementation of the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule last week, with additional input on the Assessment Tool to be used by state governments. Our coalition letter points to the need for robust directives around use of local data/knowledge, accountability for civil rights enforcement beyond fair housing, and improved community participation requirements (especially relating to the inclusion of stakeholders in public health, education, transportation and other sectors). We also emphasize the need for states to respond to both state and local fair housing issues, and the need for the state AFH to assess additional contributing factors particular to state legal and financial authority, which differs in nature as well as in degree from localities’

Other resources and opportunities

The Soros Equality Fellowship “supports emerging midcareer professionals who will become long-term innovative leaders impacting the racial justice field.” The fellowship award includes $80,000 to $100,000 over the course of the fellowship period, “accompanied by the requisite skill building, mentorship, and support to ensure a fluid leadership pipeline between early career promise and later-career expertise.”  Applications are due by November 16.  For more information, go to the Soros Equality Fellowship webpage.  (p.s. PRRAC would be very interested in hosting a fellow on our AFFH, Housing Mobility, or School Integration projects…)

Progressive City is a new online magazine of Planners Network.  It features new articles and will feature future podcasts from planning professionals committed to community empowerment and critical perspectives on city and regional planning.   The new Magazine also has a facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/pcityradical 

Filed Under: PRRAC Update Tagged With: inclusive communities project v department of treasury and office of the comptroller of the currency, Progressive City, state AFFH compliance, The Soros Equality Fellowship

Primary Sidebar

PRRAC Updates

PRRAC Update (January 14, 2021): Cashin on “Whitelash”; More HUD and ED Developments

PRRAC Update (December 22, 2020): 30th Anniversary Issue; and Another Victory for School Integration

PRRAC Update (December 10, 2020): Recommendations for a new AFFH rule + school integration goals for the first 100 days

Previous Updates...

PRRAC in the News

Billions in School Construction in CT Hasn’t Made a Dent in Segregation — But This Year, Things Could Be Different (Connecticut Mirror)

January 4, 2021

Education Dept. Gets $73.5 Billion in Funding Deal That Ends Ban on Federal Aid for Busing (Education Week)

December 22, 2020

Massachusetts’ Public Schools are Highly Segregated. It’s Time We Treated That Like the Crisis It Is (Boston Globe)

December 11, 2020

Opinion: A Truly Life-Changing Voucher Program is Within Reach for Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority (Cleveland.com)

October 12, 2020

Previous Posts...

PRRAC on Twitter

Tweets by @PRRAC_DC

Poverty & Race Journal

Footer

PRRAC – Poverty & Race Research Action Council

The Poverty & Race Research Action Council (PRRAC) is a civil rights law and policy organization based in Washington, D.C. Our mission is to promote research-based advocacy strategies to address structural inequality and disrupt the systems that disadvantage low-income people of color. PRRAC was founded in 1989, through an initiative of major civil rights, civil liberties, and anti-poverty groups seeking to connect advocates with social scientists working at the intersection of race and poverty…Read More

Archives

Resources at PRRAC

  • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fair Housing
  • Fair Housing & Community Development
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • PRRAC Update
  • School Diversity
  • Housing Choice Voucher Mobility
  • PRRAC in The Courts

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in var _ctct_m = "7608c7e98e90af7d6ba8b5fd4d901424"; //static.ctctcdn.com/js/signup-form-widget/current/signup-form-widget.min.js

PRRAC — Connecting Research to Advocacy

  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – by Program
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility (Section 8)
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
  • School Diversity
  • Environmental Justice
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Housing-School Nexus
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • One Nation Indivisible: School Diversity, Immigrant Integration, and Multi-Racial Coalitions
    • PRRAC in the Courts
    • CarsonWatch
    • Alliance Housing Justice
  • Search
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
  • Events
  • Contact