• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
  • Events
  • Contact

PRRAC — Connecting Research to Advocacy

Poverty & Race Research Action Council

MENUMENU
  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – by Program
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility (Section 8)
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
  • School Diversity
  • Environmental Justice
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Housing-School Nexus
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • One Nation Indivisible: School Diversity, Immigrant Integration, and Multi-Racial Coalitions
    • PRRAC in the Courts
    • CarsonWatch
    • Alliance Housing Justice
  • Search
    • Search

You are here: Home / Browse PRRAC Content / PRRAC Update / PRRAC Update (June 9, 2011): How important is racial diversity in education and transportation policy?

PRRAC Update (June 9, 2011): How important is racial diversity in education and transportation policy?

June 9, 2011 by

How important is racial diversity in education and transportation policy?

“Investing in Innovation”: After last December’s inclusion of racial diversity as a competitive grant priority for U.S. Department of Education programs, we were once again disappointed to see the priority missing from an important competitive grant program. In its “Final revisions to priorities, requirements, and selection criteria” for the “Investing in Innovation” program, the Department explicitly rejected our calls to include incentives for racial and economic integration in the final program rule. In contrast to Secretary Duncan’s repeated public pronouncements on diversity, the Department continues to direct more focus and funding to policies to improving achievement in racially and socio-economically isolated schools, without corresponding incentives to decrease the isolation and segregation of those schools. The Department’s official response is copied below (suggesting that the door is not permanently closed to adding priorities in the future, in spite of their absence from the rule):

“Comment: A number of commenters recommended additional priorities for the Department to use in future i3 competitions, including priorities on promoting diversity, expanding learning time, supporting school start-up models, and using technology to improve instruction.

“Discussion: While the Department recognizes the importance of the issues and topics mentioned by the commenters, this notice is not intended to specify the absolute or competitive preference priorities that will be used in a given year’s i3 competition. Rather, the purpose of this notice is to provide the Secretary with the flexibility to use any of the absolute or competitive preference priorities announced in the 2010 i3 NFP in any future i3 competition. When designing future i3 competitions, the Department may consider using other priorities, including the priorities recommended by the commenters as well as the Secretary’s Supplemental Priorities, published in the Federal Register on December 15, 2011 (75 FR 78486-78511). If in a future competition the Department decides to propose a new priority or revise an established i3 priority, rather than select from existing priorities, the Department would comply with any applicable rulemaking requirements.

“Changes: None.

TOD in high opportunity areas? The growing discussion around transit oriented development and affordable housing often begins and ends with development planning around transit stops in city neighborhoods that are potential sites of gentrification. These investments are obviously important, but transit oriented affordable housing development in high opportunity suburban communities is equally important, and can often give low income children access to higher performing, less racially isolated schools than schools located near city transit stops. Our latest presentation on transit oriented development draws on the success of New Jersey’s Fair Share Housing Center in siting low income housing near transit in “high opportunity” New Jersey communities. This presentation was developed for the “Social Equity Caucus” of the smart growth organization Transportation for America (PRRAC is a member of the caucus).

Other news and resources

Westchester Violations of Court-Ordered Desegregation Order Spur Bid for Court Enforcement: After almost two years of non-compliance by the County, and frustrated by the Justice Department’s failure to enforce its own court ordered settlement agreement (that includes active development of low income family housing in predominantly white areas of Westchester County), the Anti-Discrimination Center of New York (original plaintiff in the case) has filed a motion to intervene and enforce the settlement. “Faced with Westchester’s comprehensive and unrelenting violations of its housing desegregation obligations under a federal court Consent Decree, and with the failure of the federal government and its Monitor to enforce those obligations, the Anti-Discrimination Center (“ADC”) has moved for Court enforcement of the Decree. Read ADC’s memoranda in support of its Motion to Enforce and its Motion to Intervene. “The entry of this Consent Decree was supposed to mark the moment — for Westchester and for the country — when serious steps would begin to be taken to overcome the residential segregation that continues to plague our society,” said Robert Stroup, ADC’s co-counsel and a partner at the law firm of Levy & Ratner. “Instead, we have seen almost two years of Westchester continuing the same attitudes and polices that landed it in trouble in the first place.” ADC’s Executive Director Craig Gurian, the attorney who initiated and co-counseled the underlying multi-year case against Westchester County, said: “The federal government promised that it would hold Westchester’s feet to the fire. Instead, Westchester’s 21 months of violations haven’t even yielded a request from the federal government to the Court to hold an informal conference, let alone an effort to compel the County to obey the Decree.”

School integration updates in rural North Carolina and New Jersey and a guide to managing integration in diverse metropolitan suburbs — check out the latest newsletter of the National Coalition on School Diversity.

“Why Race & Place Matter,” by Judith Bell and Mary Lee (published by PolicyLink and The California Endowment). “This new report builds off long-standing research showing that life outcomes can be dramatically improved by changing the economic, social, and physical environments we live in.”

“Simply Unacceptable: Homelessness and the Human Right to Housing in the U.S.” (from the National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty) assesses the U.S. response to homelessness using international human rights standards.

Filed Under: PRRAC Update

Primary Sidebar

PRRAC Updates

PRRAC Update (January 14, 2021): Cashin on “Whitelash”; More HUD and ED Developments

PRRAC Update (December 22, 2020): 30th Anniversary Issue; and Another Victory for School Integration

PRRAC Update (December 10, 2020): Recommendations for a new AFFH rule + school integration goals for the first 100 days

Previous Updates...

PRRAC in the News

Billions in School Construction in CT Hasn’t Made a Dent in Segregation — But This Year, Things Could Be Different (Connecticut Mirror)

January 4, 2021

Education Dept. Gets $73.5 Billion in Funding Deal That Ends Ban on Federal Aid for Busing (Education Week)

December 22, 2020

Massachusetts’ Public Schools are Highly Segregated. It’s Time We Treated That Like the Crisis It Is (Boston Globe)

December 11, 2020

Opinion: A Truly Life-Changing Voucher Program is Within Reach for Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority (Cleveland.com)

October 12, 2020

Previous Posts...

PRRAC on Twitter

Tweets by @PRRAC_DC

Poverty & Race Journal

Footer

PRRAC – Poverty & Race Research Action Council

The Poverty & Race Research Action Council (PRRAC) is a civil rights law and policy organization based in Washington, D.C. Our mission is to promote research-based advocacy strategies to address structural inequality and disrupt the systems that disadvantage low-income people of color. PRRAC was founded in 1989, through an initiative of major civil rights, civil liberties, and anti-poverty groups seeking to connect advocates with social scientists working at the intersection of race and poverty…Read More

Archives

Resources at PRRAC

  • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fair Housing
  • Fair Housing & Community Development
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • PRRAC Update
  • School Diversity
  • Housing Choice Voucher Mobility
  • PRRAC in The Courts

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in var _ctct_m = "7608c7e98e90af7d6ba8b5fd4d901424"; //static.ctctcdn.com/js/signup-form-widget/current/signup-form-widget.min.js

PRRAC — Connecting Research to Advocacy

  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – by Program
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility (Section 8)
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
  • School Diversity
  • Environmental Justice
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Housing-School Nexus
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • One Nation Indivisible: School Diversity, Immigrant Integration, and Multi-Racial Coalitions
    • PRRAC in the Courts
    • CarsonWatch
    • Alliance Housing Justice
  • Search
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
  • Events
  • Contact