• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
  • Events
  • Contact

PRRAC — Connecting Research to Advocacy

Poverty & Race Research Action Council

MENUMENU
  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – by Program
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility (Section 8)
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
  • School Diversity
  • Environmental Justice
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Housing-School Nexus
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • One Nation Indivisible: School Diversity, Immigrant Integration, and Multi-Racial Coalitions
    • PRRAC in the Courts
    • CarsonWatch
    • Alliance Housing Justice
  • Search
    • Search

You are here: Home / Browse PRRAC Content / Advocacy Documents / Report to Congress: the “Moving to Work” Demonstration Fails to Increase Housing Choices for Low-Income Families (January 2011)

Report to Congress: the “Moving to Work” Demonstration Fails to Increase Housing Choices for Low-Income Families (January 2011)

January 1, 2011 by

One of the three statutory goals of the HUD Moving to Work (MTW) demonstration was to “increase housing choices for low-income families.”1 The MTW program gave selected Public Housing Agencies freedom to waive provisions of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 and various HUD regulations in pursuit of the program’s statutory goals.

A recent report to Congress2 on the program suggests that MTW has failed to deliver on this key statutory goal. Indeed, the impact of MTW in most participating agencies may have been to reduce resident choices to live in lower poverty, less segregated communities.

Of the thirty-three PHAs included in the study, only three (Chicago, Atlanta, and Charlotte) are reported to have expanded housing choices for low-income families. However, as the report acknowledges, even in these PHAs, the program results are mixed. For example, while the Chicago Housing Authority relocated thousands of families, some research suggested that most families were relocated to other high- poverty neighborhoods.3 Of these three PHAs, Charlotte had the best record but less than a third of the Charlotte units are located in neighborhoods with “high-quality educational and public transportation options,”4 and there is no indication that the new units are in racially integrated neighborhoods.

For most of the other PHAs reviewed in the study, MTW was not reported to have expanded resident choices, and in some cases appeared to have contributed to the redevelopment of public and assisted housing in the same neighborhoods where it was previously located. For example, the report makes no mention of the neighborhood locations of project-based units that were developed and/or converted from public-housing developments for many cities in the report.

The statutory authority for MTW allows HUD to waive provisions of the U.S. Housing Act, but not other statutes, such as civil rights or environment laws. Yet, HUD’s standard Moving to Work agreement authorizes PHAs to seek waivers of civil rights site selection rules that implement the Fair Housing Act. These site selection standards were intended to expand minority housing opportunities in the non- minority and lower poverty areas from which public housing has long been excluded. These waivers are contrary to MTW’s goal of increasing housing choices for low-income families, and are beyond the authority granted to HUD by Congress.

Based on this new report, the MTW program appears to have failed to achieve one of its three key statutory objectives – that of “increased housing choices for low-income families.” Unfortunately, the report’s use of broad generalizations with few citations makes it difficult to fully assess the fair housing performance of the 31 PHAs that have received Moving to Work status.5 This difficulty is compounded by HUD’s exemption of these PHAs from the demographic reporting requirements for the Picture of Subsidized Housing that all other PHAs are required to submit. Congress should not consider reauthorizing or expanding this program unless it is accompanied by strong fair housing requirements to expand resident housing choice in low poverty, non-racially segregated areas.

  1. Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-134, §204, 110 Stat. 1321, 283-85 (1996).
  2. DEP’T OF HOUS. & URBAN DEV., REPORT TO CONGRESS, MOVING TO WORK: INTERIM POLICY APPLICATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF THE DEMONSTRATION at 3 (2010). Click here for full report.
  3. See Id. at 24.
  4. Id. at 34.
  5. For a list of MTW agencies, click here.

Filed Under: Advocacy Documents, Fair Housing, Policy Briefs Tagged With: Disrupting, housing and school policy, report, residential segregation, School, school districts, school integration, school segregation, segregation

You might also like…

Disrupting the Reciprocal Relationship Between Housing and School Segregation (Philip Tegeler & Michael Hilton, November 2017)
Prescription for a New Neighborhood? Housing Vouchers as a Public Health Intervention (Kami Kruckenberg & Philip Tegeler, July 2010)

Primary Sidebar

PRRAC Updates

PRRAC Update (January 14, 2021): Cashin on “Whitelash”; More HUD and ED Developments

PRRAC Update (December 22, 2020): 30th Anniversary Issue; and Another Victory for School Integration

PRRAC Update (December 10, 2020): Recommendations for a new AFFH rule + school integration goals for the first 100 days

Previous Updates...

PRRAC in the News

Billions in School Construction in CT Hasn’t Made a Dent in Segregation — But This Year, Things Could Be Different (Connecticut Mirror)

January 4, 2021

Education Dept. Gets $73.5 Billion in Funding Deal That Ends Ban on Federal Aid for Busing (Education Week)

December 22, 2020

Massachusetts’ Public Schools are Highly Segregated. It’s Time We Treated That Like the Crisis It Is (Boston Globe)

December 11, 2020

Opinion: A Truly Life-Changing Voucher Program is Within Reach for Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority (Cleveland.com)

October 12, 2020

Previous Posts...

PRRAC on Twitter

Tweets by @PRRAC_DC

Poverty & Race Journal

Footer

PRRAC – Poverty & Race Research Action Council

The Poverty & Race Research Action Council (PRRAC) is a civil rights law and policy organization based in Washington, D.C. Our mission is to promote research-based advocacy strategies to address structural inequality and disrupt the systems that disadvantage low-income people of color. PRRAC was founded in 1989, through an initiative of major civil rights, civil liberties, and anti-poverty groups seeking to connect advocates with social scientists working at the intersection of race and poverty…Read More

Archives

Resources at PRRAC

  • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fair Housing
  • Fair Housing & Community Development
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • PRRAC Update
  • School Diversity
  • Housing Choice Voucher Mobility
  • PRRAC in The Courts

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in var _ctct_m = "7608c7e98e90af7d6ba8b5fd4d901424"; //static.ctctcdn.com/js/signup-form-widget/current/signup-form-widget.min.js

PRRAC — Connecting Research to Advocacy

  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – by Program
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility (Section 8)
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
  • School Diversity
  • Environmental Justice
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Housing-School Nexus
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • One Nation Indivisible: School Diversity, Immigrant Integration, and Multi-Racial Coalitions
    • PRRAC in the Courts
    • CarsonWatch
    • Alliance Housing Justice
  • Search
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
  • Events
  • Contact